| volume
41, 1981
Hughes
/ An
Overview of Farm Sector Capital and Credit Needs
Fenwick,
Harshbarger, and Swakhamer / The
Role of Farm Credit System in Financing Agriculture
Barry
/ Agricultural Lending
by Commercial Banks
Lins
/ Life Insurance
Company Lending to Agriculture
Boehje
/ Noninstitutional
Lenders in the Agricultural Credit Market
Herr
and LaDue / The
Farmers Home Administration's Changing Role and Mission
Hottel
/ The
Commodity Credit Corporation and Agricultural Lending
Penson
and Duncan / Farmers'
Alternatives to Debt Financing
Abstracts
Hughes
/
An Overview of Farm Sector Capital and Credit Needs <top>
Farmers'
financial condition in the eighties will be determined primarily by
Government and fiscal monetary policies. Net farm income and farmers'
wealth my increase substantially if inflation can be controlled and
steady growth in real output sustained. If, however, the general
economy suffers from high inflations and slow-to-negative growth in
output, farmers will probably face financial difficulties by the end
of the decade. Farm debt will likely increase to about $500 billion
by the end of the decade with a healthy general economy; it may rise
to almost $1 trillion under poor economic conditions.
Fenwick,
Harshbarger, and Swakhamer /
The Role of Farm Credit System in Financing Agriculture <top>
With
outstanding debt held by the Farm Credit System projected to exceed
$200 billion by 1990, compared with about $60 billion at the start of
1980, a further rise in the Systems' share of total farm debt is likely. Expected rapid rises in both farm asset values and production expenses
in the eighties along with unsteady farm income will adversely affect
framers' repayment and credit capacity, increasing lending risks
to the System. Because of rapidly growing credit demand, an increased
capital base will be a major goal of the Farm Credit System. It
is possible that the system will borrow on foreign money markets. New regulatory pressures from the Congress and demands for review of
the System's functions by competing lenders may also occur.
Barry
/
Agricultural Lending by Commercial Banks <top>
Competition
in financial markets is increasing. However, successful adjustment
by banks to changing regulations, along with further development of
nonlocal sources of funds, should reduce periodic liquidity stresses
and swings in credit availability for farmers. Costs of funds
will be higher and more volatile, thus increasing the need of agricultural
banks for efficient, competitive pricing on farm loans and other services
to maintain their position in farm credit markets.
Lins
/ Life Insurance
Company Lending to Agriculture <top>
As
a result of high inflation and the use of fixed interest rate mortgages,
life insurance companies have reduced the length of farm mortgage loans
to 3-5 years. This allows them the latitude to adjust interest
rates more frequently. They are also moving to acquire investments,
such as farmland or shared appreciation mortgages, where returns are
geared to the level of inflation, These changes should allow the
life insurance industry to continue serving the credit need of the agricultural
sector.
Boehje
/ Noninstitutional
Lenders in the Agricultural Credit Market <top>
Noninstitutional
lenders have been an important source of funds for farmers. Major
sources of noninstitutional funds includes merchants and dealers, personal
loans and loan guarantees, and installment land contracts. In
general, as noninstitutional lenders are partially residual claimants,
the volume of noninstitutional credit will depend on the ability of
institutional lenders to serve future credit demand at reasonable rates
and profits. Rising interest rates are expected to encourage interfamily
loans and land contracts among family members, but to discourage merchants
and dealers from extending credit unless it is needed as a sales promotion
tool.
Herr
and LaDue / The
Farmers Home Administration's Changing Role and Mission <top>
While
FmHA's traditional farm ownership and operating loan programs continue
to serve framers not well served by commercial lenders, the newer emergency
loans, now a major part of lending to farmers, serve borrowers
whose characteristics more nearly fit into the commercial category. As emergency farm borrowers become the major FmHA farm clientele in
the latter half of the seventies, the focus of the agency shifted from
limited resource farmers to one more competitive with commercial lenders. Although the future economic environment is uncertain, it is not likely
that emergency credit programs will be needed on the scale provided
in the last half of the seventies. Expansion of FmHA programs
can further distort the allocation of credit within the farm sector
and between the farm sector and other sectors of the economy. This study found no evidence that large groups of framers are currently
excluded from commercial credit and are, therefore, eligible for FmHA-type
programs.
Hottel
/ The
Commodity Credit Corporation and Agricultural Lending <top>
The
role of the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) in agricultural lending
has changed since its beginning in 1933, reflecting changes in Government
farm programs and farm economic conditions. The CCC's original
purpose of helping to minimize the effects of depressed commodity prices
has been de-emphasized as the program has shifted to the financing aspects
of crop inventories. With a "most likely" health farm
economy in the eighties, CCC's share of total farm nonrealestate debt
it expected to change only slightly from that of the seventies-- about
6-8 percent. With an unhealthy farm economy, CCC's share of such
debt will be substantially higher.
Penson
and Duncan / Farmers'
Alternatives to Debt Financing <top>
The
importance of leasing and outside equity financing is likely to grow
in the eighties if farmers find it increasingly difficult to debt finance
the rising costs of land and equipment. Information on the magnitude
of equipment leases and outside equity financing, now lacking, is needed
to monitor the changing financial structure of the farm sector. Farmers should carefully consider the after-tax cost of capital and
cash flow constraints when choosing between lease financing and debt
financing. Unless blocked by public policies, investments in farming
by nonfarmers could grow rapidly. Increased leasing and entry
outside equity capital have important implications for the future of
farm ownership and control of agriculture.
Send
questions and comments to Faye Butts: fsb1@cornell.edu
This
page was last modified on:
04/02/04
|